The Alien Light
by Adam Robbert
Excerpt:
On an earth without humans the elephants are mourning their dead and the stars are burning with an alien light. Bees and wasps are swarming from flower to flower, targeting pollinated landing pads rich with colors of a unique visible spectrum; their buzzing messengers return with good news for the rest of the hive. Bacteria move along chemical gradients, seeking out the sugary sweetness of glucose; plankton float in the water before being consumed by baleen whales. Ancient trees cast long shadows, forcing young saplings to sprout leaves in new directions; the shadows themselves are real. The universe does not beget qualities through the emergence of the human alone; the tangled bank of the ecosystem is already filled with the rustling of leaves, croaking of frogs, and thrashing of salmon. Red, gold, and turquoise are carvings of things made by human eyes and minds, but they represent only a small diorama of the available spectrum of aesthetic experiences, an aesthetic dimension unfolding for billions of years before the arrival of the human.
can you unpack this term “available” a bit, to whom/what/how?
On the one hand “available” may be a bad choice of words if we were to suggest that there are something like “available qualities” just floating around, pre-existing their experience by some organism that enacts them. The problem would be that this would imply that there is something like a standing reserve of pre-existing qualities just waiting to be discovered.
I don’t really see this as the case. So…
On the other hand, in the context above, I’m trying to point to the fact that humans live in a world of specific qualities (colors, sights, sounds) but through a variety of experimental techniques (e.g., using microphones, sonar, rovers on mars) humans can extend their senses in McLuhan-esque fashion making other kinds of qualities “available” through mediation.
Perhaps available is still the wrong word, though.
yes that’s the tension that I was feeling reading this and not surprisingly I prefer the mediation/engineering angle to the standing stock (I think we have been close to this matter in relation to talking about Lingis), but than “available” doesn’t seem to be the right term, if I have any useful alternatives come to mind I’ll stop back or maybe someone else can give us a hand and fill in the ____ .
I wonder where Whitehead’s eternal objects fit in to this question concerning the “availability” of qualities. These qualities are not actual until experienced by an organism, but they are nonetheless at least potentially real without these organisms. These potencies are the aesthetic lures of Whitehead’s creative cosmos. They are mediated by the divine organism, or anima mundi, who envisages an ordered totality of possibile qualities capable of shaping a given cosmic epoch. Without this divine mediation, the potential for qualitative valuation and so cosmic ordering would be infinite, which means there would be no value or cosmos at all, just a flood of pure relentless chaotic creativity.
So eternal objects aren’t exactly a “standing reserve” of pre-existing qualities, though they seem to be something like this at first. They aren’t exactly this, though, since they in no way pre-exist per Whitehead’s ontological principle. Eternal objects are potentials for experience, not actualities. They are only somewhat like a standing reserve in that some finite set of eternal objects is prehended by God in order to get a cosmos to emerge out of chaotic creativity. But it doesn’t seem quite right to conceive of God as a mere store house of ideas. God is an organism, which is to say God is concerned about the ideas he/she/it envisions.
[...] I believe is a longer tract he is writing about the ecology of ideas. Here is one titled “The Alien Light“: On an earth without humans the elephants are mourning their dead and the stars are burning [...]